![]() So at this point "i1Studio" properly means the spectrophotometer, but the potential for confusion with the i1Studio Display colorimeter is greater than it was with the ColorMunki line. IOW, X-Rite had the lower-end "ColorMunki" line with three devices, each with a distinct name: ColorMunki Smile (simplified display-only device), ColorMunki Display (colorimeter), and ColorMunki Photo (spectrophotometer).īut then X-Rite replaced the ColorMunki Photo spectrophotometer with the (very similar, maybe functionally identical) i1Studio spectrophotometer-which was fine, until some time later they replaced the ColorMunki Display with the i1Studio Display colorimeter. There was also the ColorMunki Smile, which was a more simplified device for displays only, which I assume (but don't know for certain) was a colorimeter. ![]() To be clear, AFAIK the spectrophotometer was the ColorMunki Photo, so "ColorMunki" without more is ambiguous. Just like X-Rite "Colormunki Display" colorimeter (not to mix it with X-Ritie ColorMunki spectrophotometers) this X-Rite "i1Display Studio" colorimeter (not to mix it with X-Rite i1Studio which is again a spectrophotometer) but of course if you only deal with no-NEC/EIZO-name monitors with ArgyllCMS by all means get it and save some money. so somebody who has or might (hope in the future to) have a normal display like NEC or EIZO shall stay away from this crippled device. Just like X-Rite "Colormunki Display" colorimeter (not to mix it with X-Ritie ColorMunki spectrophotometers) this X-Rite "i1Display Studio" colorimeter (not to mix it with X-Rite i1Studio which is again a spectrophotometer) is _NOT_ supported by applications like NEC SpectraView II. The included software wasn't nearly as good. I'm not in a big hurry for calibration/profiling, so I've been happy with the ColorMunki when used with Displa圜AL. Both of these devices feature the newly designed colorimeter from X-rite giving you enhanced color accuracy and repeatability." The body of the devices are different colors and the i1Display Pro measures up to 5x faster than conventional colorimeters. "The hardware for both of these devices is identical with two exceptions. Studio is what used to be a ColorMunki Display Colorimeter - do not buy it. How far up you think you may want to go with this upgrade may be the best way to decide which colorimeter to get. You say you may be upgrading one or both of your monitors later this year. That said, these devices don't work with the full capabilities some of the more sophisticated / higher-end monitors, which do work with i1 Display Pro / i1 Display Pro Plus. ![]() I have its predecessor (possibly older twin) the ColorMunki Display, and I've been quite happy with it. The tougher question is the one you seem focused on, whether to save some money and get the more basic i1 Display Studio. IOW, I think you're on the right track there, maybe for more reasons than you knew. Between that, the wider functionality for potential future monitors, and the modest cost difference, today I have to think it makes much more sense to get the i1 Display Pro Plus compared to the older i1 Display Pro. I'm not having much luck finding info or recommendations on their comparisonĮasy issue first: somebody I consider a high-level expert-I can't recall who (maybe Iliah Borg?), or where (probably the LuLa forum?)-reported that the i1 Display Pro Plus had notably better accuracy in some regard-again, I can't recall the specifics-compared to the older i1 Display Pro. In Aus, the Studio is $250 with the Pro being about $380 (the pro Plus is only a little more than that, so I'm sort of thinking that if I get the Pro, I may as well just get the Pro Plus as there's a fair chance my next monitor would be HDR) My workspace is not optimal in terms of ambient lighting as window light does strike the monitor at various times during the day, or otherwise the room lighting can vary a fair bit (so I'm wondering if this 'continuous ambient' monitoring is actually useful. New to colour management so I know basically nothing about it, and I probably will never get into some of the real nitty gritty. I have 2 monitors, one very old IPS, one newer monitor, I may be upgrading one or both later this year (undecided). Looking online suggests the i1 Display is better than the spyder.I had an old i1 display 2, really didn't like it but happy to give them a shot. So, I've decided to bite the bullet and buy a monitor calibrator, being unhappy with 'visual' calibrations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |